| SHAUN MICALLEF'S ONLINE WORLD AROUND HIM Back Home | ||||
| Interview: Shaun
Micallef By Alex Rafalowicz Empire Times (Flinders University) February 2005 (Thanks to Mout for the transcription!!!) ALEX
RAFALOWICZ interviewed SHAUN MICALLEF as he prepares for his upcoming
Adelaide show with Glynn Nicholas, THE PLEASURE OF THEIR COMPANY. Asked
about returning to Adelaide, Shaun was hoping to receive an enthusiastic
response from his old home town: Hopefully
all the local newspapers will carry big “local boy makes good”
headlines and the State will put on ceremonies similar to…do you
remember Princesses Diana? Similar to her funeral, with armed salutes all
the way from devil’s elbow to the city. Although apparently devil’s
elbow no longer exits, and hence I should find myself to be quite
disorientated. Discussing
his pervious work in Adelaide, Shaun noted that it could in no way be
called ‘professional’: In
fact, quite unprofessional springs to mind, as you will realise if you
come to see The Pleasure of Their Company. I did revues and cabaret with
people like Francis Greenslade and we did charge admission, but we never
made any money so I suppose that in the strict sense it was amateur work. Shaun
was also concerned by his first live show in 10 years, stating, “the
audience can expect quite a nervous and unprofessional show from me as I
struggle to perform without an autocue. This is the first time I’ve had
to learn lines in a long time!” Asked
how it felt to have a ‘cult’ following amongst university students,
including the quote “man, I’d give my left-testicle to do a show like
that,” Shaun responds: Yes,
that is the admission price. Well you actually do have to when working for
the ABC; it took most of my left testicle and a large portion of my soul.
Whereas with the commercial networks, you have to give half your brain and
leave the other half at the door. He
cites for example Big Brother, which he claims “does seem to show the
success of marketing something straight to a target of gullible morons all
of a similar age.” “My target audience is different, more like people
who attend University or Tafe,” he adds. We
also discussed whether Shaun felt pressured to be ‘funny’ all of the
time. He flatly refuted this: I
never feel the expectation that I’m supposed to be ‘on’ all of the
time like some comedians complain about. Perhaps it’s because my persona
from the tellie is standoffish, cold and nasty, so people don’t feel
they can approach me…this is socially convenient for me as it’s
exactly how I am. Shaun
claims that he is “not really a comedian at all.” He considers himself
to be “more of a comic actor”, playing characters such as the
“ex-lawyer looking uncomfortable wearing a costume.” “People think
it’s an act but really it’s just me,” he adds. Our
conversation then turns to a critical appraisal of some of his former
work, including his Yoplait skits on The Incomplete Shaun Micallef. Shaun
says with embarrassed laughter: I
was actually hosting the Logies at that time, so I had very little say as
to what went in. In theory I had no control over the Full Frontal
material, and I tell you that I fought hard to stop a lot of the worthless
shit I created over those three years from being rereleased. When
asked about prospective shows, (including his upcoming show Mouse Patrol
on the ABC) Shaun the consummate lawyer could neither confirm nor deny: We’ve
written two scripts and submitted them to the ABC, who has given us the
amber light. Which apparently has recently become darker, which I think is
a good thing, although maybe it being lighter would be better. I think
it’s at about 75% but I suppose we have to check our scrotes to see how
much we can give. Shaun
then noted that his phone battery was dying, and before it did he had one
last plug for the kids at Flinders: “You should come and see The
Pleasure of Their Company on at the Arts Theatre from the 11th of March.
You’ll be a better person for it.” With
that he was gone, like a ghost in the night on the set of a poor quality
horror film (ie with a lot of static and beeping). But then, only one hour
later, the phone rang and it was a profusely apologetic Shaun! Shaun
went on to espouse his views on the proposed anti-student legislation of
the Federal Howard
Government that could see this beloved paper interviewing him gone without
a trace: “What’s the logic behind that, presuming there is any?” I
explained to him that Nelson thought that students didn’t want to pay a
compulsory fee to their hardworking student organizations. He laughed.
“I see - their logic is that because they’ve imposed a large increase
in the HECS bill that hangs over your head for the next five years, you
shouldn’t have to pay anything else? Besides, the union fee is pretty
low isn’t it?” We too ask the same question Shaun! It was like the
Students’ Association had written the script for him (they hadn’t!). I
explained that our Student Services Fee covered the sports teams and
myriad of clubs, subsidises food and beer, provided student representation
and of course produces this beautiful, beautiful newspaper. As a man of
consummate good taste and sense, at the suggestion that Empire Times would
have to fold, he replied “we can’t let that happen.” Here, here! We
got back to Shaun’s career, where he quickly dispelled the popular urban
myth that he got his big break after Steve Vizard called his law office
and appreciated his witty asides: That’s
been around for a long time, that I was speaking to Vizard on the phone
and he offered me job. In truth, I didn’t speak to him for two years
after I started working for him. It
turns out that one of the people Shaun went to law school with, Gary
McCaffrie had “fixed his wagon to a star and went to Melbourne to start
working on Fast Forward,” which was by no means an easy task. “In the
end I just rang him up and he got me a job…far less interesting, but you
do have to know someone who knows someone. And I knew someone who knew
someone and that was it.” I
will now produce the rest of the interview, which resulted in this
exchange: A.
Have
you got any advice for a bored and struggling law student? S.
Is
this you? Bored and you’re in law? Well how long is the course now at
Flinders? When I did it, it was three years, 1980 until 1983. Oh wait,
that’s four years. A.
Well
you obviously didn’t do a maths degree. S.
No
I didn’t. What got me through it was doing the revues. We did three a
year and it was atrocious material, awful stuff looking back on it. We
were idiots who didn’t know anything. But it seeded the timing and being
able to cope with shit material and get laughs out of awful things. It was
a really good experience. To anyone who listens I would say that if you
want a career in writing or comedy then take advantage of any audience
that’s given to you. And it was always a supportive audience from the
university, not particularly discerning. When I think back on it, it was
really horribly sexist, horribly naďve, and horribly misogynistic. A.
Not
the basis of our publication this year, don’t you worry. S.
Good
to hear. But anybody going along to uni and doing their course and
that’s it, they’re not experiencing the real university life. A.
It
sounds like you’re the public face of student orgs at this stage Shaun! S.
I
know, but I think that’s because when I went it was free and the union
fee was $100 but you got a tertiary allowance from the government which
paid for your books and living but didn’t need to be repaid. These days
there are few positions, well more, but more are occupied by people who
pay up-front. A.
That
and the fact that there is no allowance for students living independently,
unless you earn over $16 000? S.
And
that’s a bit hard when you’re working behind the bar at the British
Hotel. A.
Did
you work at the British? S.
No,
but I did drink heavily there. A.
With
the chief justice? Was he still the chief justice? S.
God
no! I didn’t even know he went there! A.
Yeah
Doyle, no not Doyle. Now we’ll get done for defamation. What’s his
name? You would know him; you would have studied him, a Chief Justice from
a long time ago? Who was a drunk? S.
Which
one?! A.
The
Chief Justice, Bray. S.
Bray?
No, he was the vice-chancellor when I studied there. He used to stumble
around in bare feet and a raincoat and probably nothing else. A.
Yes!
The story I heard was that he was pulled from a tree calling out: “I’m
the chief justice, I’m the chief justice.” S.
Yes,
“I’m the Chief Justice, I’m a ripening fruit just about to fall.”
Don’t write that down, he’s dead now isn’t he? A.
I
wouldn’t know. S.
I
think he’s long gone. A.
Well
you can’t get done for defamation to the dead. S.
Then
go for your life. “Hello I’m ripe, I’m falling from the tree” says
Chief Justice Bray, according to Micallef. A.
We
now have a new byline to replace “we’ll have to check our scrotes.”
Now is this a mobile number I shouldn’t give out? S.
It’s
one you can keep. In fact, I keep getting calls from people who want to
write. I think the ABC gives it out, god bless them. No
Micallef, god bless you, and your pro-universal membership ways! And your
show too, with Glynn Nicholas, The Pleasure of Their Company, at the Arts
Theatre from March 11. |
||||